Attorney Review Update

In a prior blog post, we discussed the†Conley v. Guerrero†decision, in which Judge Coleman†held that an attorney review letter was validly and effectively sent, by fax and email, although†the contract in the transaction and the New Jersey Supreme Court decision in†New Jersey State Bar Association v. New Jersey Association of Realtor Boards†required the letter to be sent by certified mail, telegram or personal delivery.

The Appellate Division recently upheld Judge Colemanís position in a published opinion.† It noted that the purpose of the method of delivery requirement for attorney review notices†was to protect the realtors, and that in the Conley case, no realtor complained about the notice.† Further, the court noted that the notice sent by the sellerís attorney was received by the buyerís attorney, and substantially complied with the requirements. It noted that to hold otherwise would result in a forfeiture of the sellerís right to disapprove the contract of sale.

However, the Appellate Division rejected the suggestion that it update the notice requirement in†New Jersey State Bar Association v. New Jersey Association of Realtor Boards†to permit attorney review notices to be sent by email and facsimile. That will await another day, hopefully soon.

Somerset Office

220 Davidson Ave #300, Somerset, NJ 08873

Contact Us

Charles D. Whelan III has been committed to excellence for over 30 years. With offices located centrally in New Jersey, he is able to provide businesses and individuals with excellent legal services.

Watchung Office

475 Watchung Ave, Watchung, NJ 07069

Scroll to Top