Tenant’s Counterclaim Barred On House Lease

In the recent reported Appellate Division decision in Raji v. Saucedo,  the trial court determination barring a tenant’s counterclaim against the landlord was upheld.  The facts were that the landlord filed an eviction action for non-payment of rent.  On the trial date, the parties negotiated an agreement that the tenant would make some rental payment in exchange for being allowed to remain in the house for a couple of months.  That agreement was entered by the court as a consent judgment.

The tenant failed to pay and was locked out.  Then the landlord filed a second lawsuit to recover the agreed rent payment due under the consent judgment.  The tenant filed a counterclaim against the landlord for the cost of replacing a pool liner.  Following a trial on the second lawsuit, the trial court rejected the counterclaim, finding that the parties had reached a settlement in the form of the consent judgment entered in the eviction case, and that the tenant could have, but did not, raise the counterclaim as a part of the consent judgment negotiation and therefore was barred from raising it in the second lawsuit.  The Appellate Division upheld this result.

There are serious due process concerns presented by this situation.   First, the Appellate Division acknowledges that neither the landlord nor the tenant is permitted to assert a claim for damages in an eviction action.  The landlord seeks possession of the property, usually for non-payment of rent.  It is entirely unclear to me how a tenant would understand at the time of an eviction trial that s/he would need to assert any monetary claim related to the tenancy or otherwise be barred.  This is particularly true where the tenant is not represented by counsel, which is usually the case.

This situation should be contrasted from that presented in a Marini habitability hearing, where upon posting of the rent due with the court, the tenant is entitled to present evidence as to whether s/he is entitled to a rent reduction because the property is not habitable.  In that regard, the tenant may have incurred expenses in curing the habitability condition and would be entitled to present that to the court as an offset to the rent.

In the context of an eviction case such as Raji, it is my experience that it is not so clear in the typical hectic process unfolding in the courtroom and mediation on the trial date that a tenant would know to assert its non-habitability claims against the landlord at that time or be forever barred from asserting them in the future.  That is particularly true where the tenant does not have an attorney, which is usually the case.  Consideration should be given to the inclusion of a provision in the form of consent judgment by the New Jersey Superior Court that the tenant expressly waives all monetary claims against the landlord.  At least the tenant would have clear written notice of what s/he is agreeing to when signing.


We selected you because you took time to talk with me at first contact. I believe it was a good 15-20 minute phone conversation involving a mix of business and personal. In fact, you were the only attorney that asked about what it is we wanted. Every other attorney merely quoted a rate for services. As I recall, you did not even mention money until I asked near the end of the conversation. You give attorneys a good name. I only wish the majority of the other attorneys on this planet had your knowledge and demeanor. Satisfied Attorney Client After years of frustration with an incompetent attorney, I had the good fortune of finding Mr. Whelan. His clear and concise communication style led me to hire him after a free consultation and enabled speedy filing of my case. The difficulties of managing a NJ rental property from CA became manageable thanks to his expertise and knowledge about the complex rental laws in NJ. You took time to talk with me at first contact. You were the only attorney that asked about what it is we wanted. Celeste B. I will never forget my attorney's dedication to obtaining a substantial recovery for me under a severe time deadline and with no cooperation from my former lawyer. Also, Mr. Whelan was very accommodating of my limited English throughout the case and my lack of understanding of the American court system. Personal Injury Client Chuck is well versed in business law, real estate law, landlord and tenant law as well as Planning, zoning and land use. Believe me we challenged his patience, creativity and legal knowledge. Chuck's intellect and ability would be enough. However, his integrity is what impresses me as much, if not more. I would highly recommend Chuck for a variety of legal services without hesitation. We are grateful to be associated with Chuck and appreciate his hard work on our behalf. Happy Small Business Client Mr. Whelan is a great lawyer. His main concern is always the client. In every matter that he has represented me, I have been very happy with the way everything worked out. I know I can trust him to protect my interests and rights. Satisfied Small Business Client Mr. Whelan provides critical services to our executive management team. He provides a very straight-forward and practical approach to our legal issues. He is timely and extremely reliable. Happy Client An extremely capable and trustworthy attorney with an excellent legal skill set. He delivers the results you want and practices his craft with a clear sense of honor and integrity. I would recommend him unequivocally to any person or business needing legal representation or counsel. Happy Client Mr. Whelan is a great lawyer. His main concern is always the client. In every matter that he has represented me, I have been very happy with the way everything worked out. I know I can trust him to protect my interests and rights. Satisfied Client Mr. Whelan is very professional and honest. He has a tremendous knowledge of all areas of law and is very practical in his approach. He is extremely effective at bringing a swift conclusion to various matters. He is well respected by his peers. I would highly recommend Mr. Whelan for any real estate, litigation, bankruptcy or contract issues. Happy Small Business Client Charles has been nothing but friendly and professional with handling my legal needs. Charles has also handled most of my family’s legal matters and real estate closings. I have known Charles for many years and whenever I have needed good advice, I turn to him. Over the years he has become a true friend that I would recommend his services to anyone. Thanks Chuck for all you have done for me! Satisfied Client I have hired Mr. Whelan for several deals over years. I know he will respond quickly and provide professional guidance through every phase of my real estate deals. He is easy to talk to and will make you feel like you're his top priority client. Satisfied Real Estate Client Charles gave me sincere and professional legal advice and even guidance how to understand the situation for free. His opinion was highly professional with deep understanding for the law. I trust him and recommend him for anyone who need a first class trustfully lawyer. John Soliman Mr. Whelan is the absolute BEST!!! He's super professional, to the point, yet very compassionate. He knows his stuff!! I found him online and he got back to me ASAP and we got the ball rolling with no holdup. I would definitely recommend his services with no hesitation. He's trustworthy and won't waste your time which everyone can appreciate. Give him a call!! Sadiyah Thompson Previous Next

New Brunswick Office

Contact Us

Charles D. Whelan III has been committed to excellence for over 30 years. With offices located centrally in New Jersey, he is able to provide businesses and individuals with excellent legal services.

Click the Button Below to Get In Touch

Schedule a Consultation

Watchung Office

Scroll to Top